Each week, Crowell & Moring’s State Attorneys General team highlights significant actions that State AGs have taken. See our State Attorneys General page for more insights. Below are the updates from October 22-28, 2026:

Multistate

  • A coalition of the Federal Trade Commission and 20 attorneys general filed a lawsuit against Dollar General Corporation, alleging the company routinely charged customers more at the register than the prices displayed on shelves, price tags, and in advertisements, costing consumers millions of dollars.  The complaint alleges that thousands of Dollar General stores extracted unlawful overcharges from vulnerable shoppers, that the company received tens of thousands of consumer complaints confirming widespread harm, and that Dollar General failed to implement adequate corrective policies despite having knowledge of the problem.  The FTC and participating states allege these practices violate the FTC Act, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and applicable state consumer protection and consumer fraud laws.  The participating states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Utah, and Wisconsin.
Continue Reading State AG News: Deceptive Practices, Pricing, Fintech (October 22-28, 2026)

Each week, Crowell & Moring’s State Attorneys General team highlights significant actions that State AGs have taken. See our State Attorneys General page for more insights. Below are the updates from October 15-21, 2026:

Multistate

  • A coalition of 40 attorneys general filed a notice in the bankruptcy proceedings of Character Technologies, Inc. to raise concerns about the company’s privacy and safety practices. The company was responsible for an AI chatbot platform, Character.AI, that was sued in 2024 for wrongful death attributed to the platform’s emotional impact on a child. The filing highlighted the significant volume of sensitive user data held by Character.AI, including private chatbot conversations involving both adults and children.
  • A coalition of 18 attorneys general secured a $664 million settlement with Snap Finance, a consumer financial services company offering lease-to-own agreements through merchant partners. The settlement also requires Snap Finance to change its business practices related to advertising restrictions, disclosure and transparency, servicing protections, lease terminations, and merchant training and compliance.
Continue Reading State AG News: Data Privacy, Antitrust, AI, Consumer Protection (October 15–21, 2026)

Each week, Crowell & Moring’s State Attorneys General team highlights significant actions that State AGs have taken. See our State Attorneys General page for more insights. Below are the updates from October 8-14, 2026:

Multistate

  • A bipartisan coalition of 45 state attorneys general sought court approval of three settlements with Ascend Laboratories, Citron Pharma, and Mayne Pharma, resolving allegations that the generic drug manufacturers engaged in a widespread, long-running conspiracy to artificially inflate and manipulate prices, reduce competition, and unreasonably restrain trade with regard to numerous generic prescription drugs in violation of state antitrust laws. The settlements focus primarily on injunctive relief, requiring each company to implement internal reforms to ensure fair competition and antitrust compliance going forward. The action is part of the broader, ongoing multistate generic drug price-fixing litigation led by the Connecticut Attorney General’s Office, in which states have now secured settlements totaling approximately $496.5 million from multiple manufacturers, with the first trial in the litigation scheduled for February 2027.
Continue Reading State AG News: Consumer Fraud and Settlements (October 8-14, 2026)

Each week, Crowell & Moring’s State Attorneys General team highlights significant actions that State AGs have taken. See our State Attorneys General page for more insights. Below are the updates from October 1-7, 2026:

Multistate

  • A coalition of 21 state attorneys general and additional local governmental entities sued the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”), challenging the agency’s final rule reducing corporate average fuel economy (“CAFE”) standards for new vehicles. Under the final rule, vehicle manufacturers are required to achieve an average fuel efficiency of 34.9 miles per gallon by 2031, a reduction from the previously established goal of over 50 miles per gallon. The coalition argues that CAFE standards have historically lowered costs for American consumers by driving improvements in vehicle fuel efficiency and have reduced gas prices.

Texas

  • Attorney General Paxton secured a $7.5 million settlement with Tris Pharmaceuticals (“Tris”), a pharmaceutical company, and its CEO, Ketan Mehta. The settlement agreement resolves claims that Tris misrepresented the efficacy of its attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (“ADHD”) drug marketed for children, in violation of the Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act. Tris allegedly directed its sales representatives to make misleading claims to physicians, asserting that the drug acted quicker than competing products and offered other unsubstantiated benefits to children. The judgment requires Tris to pay $7.5 million to the State of Texas.

Iowa

  • Attorney General Bird sued ADI Global Distribution Inc. (“ADI”), a distributor of video surveillance products, for alleged violations of the Iowa Consumer Fraud Act. The petition alleges that ADI sold security cameras to consumers that were manufactured by two China-based entities identified by the Federal Communications Commission to pose a national security risk, while concealing the true origin of the products and the manufacturers’ affiliations. The petition further alleges that ADI, at times, altered product labels to obscure the cameras’ origins, and that none of the accompanying documentation informed consumers of the associated data-security vulnerabilities or of their presence on U.S. government lists. The petition seeks monetary penalties of up to $40,000 per violation, and injunctive relief.

Florida

  • Attorney General Uthmeier filed a motion for a temporary injunction against Meta Platforms, Inc. and Instagram, LLC (“Meta”) in the Sixth Circuit, for alleged violations of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. The motion argues that Meta deliberately designed addictive features to exploit the psychological vulnerabilities of users under the age of 18. The motion seeks to require Meta to: cease making deceptive statements and omissions about its platforms; implement age-verification measures and remove all Florida users under the age of 14, or, if those measures cannot be implemented within 30 days, cease providing users under the age of 18 access to the platforms in Florida entirely; and modify its platforms to reduce addictive and harmful use by teen users.

Each week, Crowell & Moring’s State Attorneys General team highlights significant actions that State AGs have taken. See our State Attorneys General page for more insights. Below are the updates from September 24-30, 2026:

Multistate

  • A bipartisan coalition of 26 attorneys general sent a letter to congressional leaders urging Congress to establish a federal framework for overseeing artificial intelligence development and to protect state authority to regulate AI by prohibiting federal preemption of state laws. The coalition outlined several core principles it believes federal AI legislation must address, including: mandating safety testing and performance standards; requiring transparent and uniform incident reporting with publicly available findings; ensuring that AI safety infrastructure and leadership operate independently of commercial incentives; pursuing international coordination to manage the pace of AI advancement and prevent the emergence of uncontrollable superintelligence; and expressly preserving the authority of state officials to enforce both federal and state AI protections.
Continue Reading State AG News: AI Regulation, Data Protection, Food Safety (September 24-30, 2026)

Each week, Crowell & Moring’s State Attorneys General team highlights significant actions that State AGs have taken. See our State Attorneys General page for more insights. Below are the updates from September 18-23, 2026:

Multistate

  • A bipartisan coalition of 41 attorneys general announced a $694 million settlement with Credit Acceptance Corporation (CAC), one of the nation’s largest subprime auto lenders. CAC allegedly provided loans it knew or should have known that consumers could not afford and allowed unlawful “packing” of Vehicle Service Contracts (VSC) and Guaranteed Asset Protection (GAP) products onto consumer auto loans. The settlement provides $60 million in cash restitution for consumers who received particularly risky loans, $388 million in debt relief for consumers whose vehicles were repossessed, and $246 million in debt relief to allow consumers to keep their vehicles, plus $15 million paid to the states. CAC will also be required to provide pre-loan risk disclosures, institute a seven-year vehicle price cap of 109% of retail book value, implement off-ramps for quickly failing loans, and establish enhanced dealer monitoring.
Continue Reading State AG News: Consumer Protection, Settlements, Federal Regulation (September 18-23, 2026)

Register now to join Crowell’s State AG team as they kick off a two-part webinar series examining the 2026 State Attorney General elections and what they mean for businesses operating across the United States.

Part One: Mid-Cycle Check-In: The AG Races to Watch

Wednesday, October 7, 2026 | 12:00 to 1:00 p.m. ET

This session will provide a timely look at the Attorney General races to watch, key primary election results, emerging enforcement priorities, and how election outcomes could shape multistate investigations, consumer protection initiatives, and federal-state enforcement efforts in the years ahead.

Continue Reading Register Now! The Future of State Enforcement: Insights from the 2026 AG Elections

Each week, Crowell & Moring’s State Attorneys General team highlights significant actions that State AGs have taken. See our State Attorneys General page for more insights. Below are the updates from September 10-17, 2026:

Multistate

  • A coalition of 21 attorneys general filed two lawsuits to protect endangered and threatened species. The suits allege that new rules undermine essential protections for wildlife under the Endangered Species Act.
  • A bipartisan coalition of 49 attorneys general urged the Federal Communications Commission to strengthen its “Know Your Upstream Provider” (KYUP) requirements to help prevent scammers from using U.S. phone networks to make unlawful robocalls. KYUP rules require voice service providers to take steps to not regularly pass through unlawful calls.
Continue Reading State AG News: Deceptive Practices, Consumer Fraud, Environmental Policy (September 10-17, 2026)

In a recently published Law360 article, Crowell attorneys Stacey Geis, Juge Gregg, and Emily Werkmann examine the rapidly evolving legal landscape surrounding state packaging and recycling laws, analyzing the mounting wave of constitutional challenges to extended producer responsibility programs now enacted across seven states and the significant compliance, litigation, and strategic implications for companies navigating this uncertainty. Click here to read the full article.

Each week, Crowell & Moring’s State Attorneys General team highlights significant actions that State AGs have taken. See our State Attorneys General page for more insights. Below are the updates from September 3-9, 2026:

Multistate

  • A multistate coalition of 22 attorneys general, co-led by Illinois Attorney General Raoul and the attorneys general of California, Connecticut, Maryland, and Massachusetts, filed suit challenging a final rule issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services prohibiting federal Medicaid and CHIP reimbursement for gender-affirming care for beneficiaries under ages 18 and 19, respectively, while continuing to cover the same treatments when provided to non-transgender youth. The coalition argues that since the creation of Medicaid and CHIP in the 1960s, Congress has reserved to states the authority to determine which services are covered under their programs, and that HHS and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services lack statutory authority to categorically exclude medically necessary services from reimbursement based solely on the patient’s transgender status. The complaint alleges violations of the Administrative Procedure Act and the Spending Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The rule is set to take effect on October 13, 2026.
Continue Reading State AG News: Consumer Protection, Healthcare, Voting (September 3-9, 2026)